Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
doi:10.5194/hess-2015-538
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
19 Jan 2016
Review status
A revision of this discussion paper is under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Flood risk reduction and flow buffering as ecosystem services: a flow persistence indicator for watershed health
M. van Noordwijk1,2, L. Tanika1, and B. Lusiana1 1World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), SE Asia program, Bogor, Indonesia
2Wageningen University, Plant Production Systems, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Abstract. Flood damage depends on location and adaptation of human presence and activity to inherent variability of river flow. Reduced predictability of river flow is a common sign of degrading watersheds associated with increased flooding risk and reduced dry-season flows. The dimensionless FlowPer parameter (Fp), representing predictability, is key to a parsimonious recursive model of river flow, Qt = FpQt−1 + (1−Fp)(Pt−Etx), with Q, P and E expressed in mm d−1. Fp varies between 0 and 1, and can be derived from a time-series of measured (or modeled) river flow data. The spatially averaged precipitation term Pt and preceding cumulative evapotranspiration since previous rain Etx are treated as constrained but unknown, stochastic variables. A decrease in Fp from 0.9 to 0.8 means peak flow doubling from 10 to 20% of peak rainfall (minus its accompanying Etx) and, in a numerical example, an increase in expected flood duration by 3 days. We compared Fp estimates from four meso-scale watersheds in Indonesia and Thailand, with varying climate, geology and land cover history, at a decadal time scale. Wet-season (3-monthly) Fp values are lower than dry-season values in climates with pronounced seasonality. A wet-season Fp value above 0.7 was achievable in forest-agroforestry mosaic case studies. Interannual variability in Fp is large relative to effects of land cover change; multiple years of paired-plot data are needed to reject no-change null-hypotheses. While empirical evidence at scale is understandably scarce, Fp trends over time serve as a holistic scale-dependent performance indicator of degrading/recovering watershed health.

Citation: van Noordwijk, M., Tanika, L., and Lusiana, B.: Flood risk reduction and flow buffering as ecosystem services: a flow persistence indicator for watershed health, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., doi:10.5194/hess-2015-538, in review, 2016.
M. van Noordwijk et al.
M. van Noordwijk et al.
M. van Noordwijk et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 360 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
252 89 19 360 27 28

Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jan 2016)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Jan 2016)

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 24 Mar 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Deforestation is commonly understood to increase and reforestation to reduce flood risk, but scientific evidence at the relevant landscape scale is scarce and contested. A measure of day-to-day flow persistence is defined here. It is proposed as simple performance indicator for watershed health that can respond to changes in climate and land cover quality, quantity and spatial pattern. Data for four watersheds show decrease or increase in flow persistence in degradation and restoration phases.
Deforestation is commonly understood to increase and reforestation to reduce flood risk, but...
Share