Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
doi:10.5194/hessd-12-4157-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
24 Apr 2015
Review status
A revision of this discussion paper for further review has not been submitted.
Uncertainty analysis for evaluating the accuracy of snow depth measurements
J.-E. Lee1, G. W. Lee1, M. Earle2, and R. Nitu2 1Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences, Research and Training Team for Future Creative Astrophysicists and Cosmologists, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehakro, Buk-gu, Daegu,702-701, Republic of Korea
2Observing Systems and Engineering, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada, 4905 Dufferin St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Abstract. A methodology for quantifying the accuracy of snow depth measurement are demonstrated in this study by using the equation of error propagation for the same type sensors and by compariong autimatic measurement with manual observation. Snow depth was measured at the Centre for Atmospheric Research Experiments (CARE) site of the Environment Canada (EC) during the 2013–2014 winter experiment. The snow depth measurement system at the CARE site was comprised of three bases. Three ultrasonic and one laser snow depth sensors and twelve snow stakes were placed on each base. Data from snow depth sensors are quality-controlled by range check and step test to eliminate erroneous data such as outliers and discontinuities.

In comparison with manual observations, bias errors were calculated to show the spatial distribution of snow depth by considering snow depth measured from four snow stakes located on the easternmost side of the site as reference. The bias error of snow stakes on the west side of the site was largest. The uncertainty of all pairs of stakes and the average uncertainty for each base were 1.81 and 1.52 cm, respectively. The bias error and normalized bias removed root mean square error (NBRRMSE) for each snow depth sensor were calculated to quantify the systematic error and random error in comparison of snow depth sensors with manual observations that share the same snow depth target. The snow depth sensors on base 12A (11A) measured snow depth larger (less) than manual observation up to 10.8 cm (5.21 cm), and the NBRRMSEs ranged from 5.10 to 16.5%. Finally, the instrumental uncertainties of each snow depth sensor were calculated by comparing three sensors of the same type installed at the different bases. The instrumental uncertainties ranged from 0.62 to 3.08 cm.


Citation: Lee, J.-E., Lee, G. W., Earle, M., and Nitu, R.: Uncertainty analysis for evaluating the accuracy of snow depth measurements, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 12, 4157-4190, doi:10.5194/hessd-12-4157-2015, 2015.
J.-E. Lee et al.
Interactive discussionStatus: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version      Supplement - Supplement
 
RC C1941: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Jun 2015 Printer-friendly Version 
AC C5117: 'Author comment : Responses to reviewer 1, 26 Nov 2015', J.-E. Lee, 26 Nov 2015 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
 
RC C3482: 'Referee Comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Sep 2015 Printer-friendly Version 
AC C5128: 'Author comment : Responses to reviewer 2, 26 Nov 2015', J.-E. Lee, 26 Nov 2015 Printer-friendly Version Supplement 
J.-E. Lee et al.
J.-E. Lee et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 579 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
312 224 43 579 30 38

Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Apr 2015)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Apr 2015)

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 26 Apr 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share