Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
doi:10.5194/hess-2017-111
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
01 Mar 2017
Review status
This discussion paper is under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
The importance of parameterization when simulating the hydrologic response of vegetative land-use change
Jeremy White, Victoria Stengel, Samuel Rendon, and John Banta U.S. Geological Survey, Austin TX, 78754
Abstract. Computer models of hydrologic systems are frequently used to investigate the hydrologic response of land-use change. If the modeling results are used to inform resource-management decisions, then providing robust estimates of uncertainty in the simulated response is an important consideration. Here we examine the importance of parameterization, a necessarily subjective process, on uncertainty estimates of the simulated hydrologic response of land-use change. Specifically, we apply the soil water assessment tool (SWAT) model to a 1.4 km2 watershed in south Texas to investigate the simulated hydrologic response of brush management (the mechanical removal of woody plants), a discrete land-use change. The watershed was previously instrumented before and after brush-management activities were undertaken and estimates of precipitation, streamflow, and evapotranspiration (ET) are available; these data were used to condition and verify the model. The role of parameterization in brush-management simulation was evaluated by constructing two models, one with 12 adjustable parameters (reduced parameterization) and one with 1,305 adjustable parameters (full parameterization). Both models were subjected to global sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo and generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) conditioning to identify important model inputs and to estimate uncertainty in several quantities of interest related to brush management. Many realizations from both parameterizations were identified as behavorial in that they reproduce daily streamflow acceptably well according to Nash-Sutcliffe, percent bias and coefficient of determination. However, the total volumetric ET difference resulting from simulated brush management remains highly uncertain after conditioning to daily streamflow, indicating that streamflow data alone are not sufficient to inform the model inputs that most influence the simulated outcomes of brush management. Additionally, the reduced-parameterization model grossly underestimates uncertainty in the total volumetric ET difference compared to the full-parameterization model; total volumetric ET difference is a primary metric for evaluating the outcomes of brush management. The failure of the reduced-parameterization model to provide robust uncertainty estimates demonstrates the importance of parameterization when attempting to quantify uncertainty in land-use change simulations.

Citation: White, J., Stengel, V., Rendon, S., and Banta, J.: The importance of parameterization when simulating the hydrologic response of vegetative land-use change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., doi:10.5194/hess-2017-111, in review, 2017.
Jeremy White et al.
Jeremy White et al.
Jeremy White et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 287 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
257 27 3 287 7 2 6

Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Mar 2017)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Mar 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 287 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 283 with geography defined and 4 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 26 Mar 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share