Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.256 IF 4.256
  • IF 5-year value: 4.819 IF 5-year 4.819
  • CiteScore value: 4.10 CiteScore 4.10
  • SNIP value: 1.412 SNIP 1.412
  • SJR value: 2.023 SJR 2.023
  • IPP value: 3.97 IPP 3.97
  • h5-index value: 58 h5-index 58
  • Scimago H index value: 99 Scimago H index 99
Discussion papers | Copyright
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-436
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 07 Aug 2017

Research article | 07 Aug 2017

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

Modelling Hydrological Ecosystem Services – A state of the art model comparison

Anna Lüke and Jochen Hack Anna Lüke and Jochen Hack
  • Section of Engineering Hydrology and Water Management, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 64287, Germany

Abstract. Different simulation models are used in science and practice in order to incorporate hydrological ecosystem services in decision-making processes. This contribution compares three simulation models, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool, a traditional hydrological model, and two ecosystem services models, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model and the Resource Investment Optimization System model. The three models are compared on a theoretical and conceptual basis as well in a comparative case study application. The application of the models to a study area in Nicaragua reveals that a practical benefit to apply these models for different questions in decision-making generally exists. However, modelling of hydrological ecosystem services is associated with a high application effort and requires input data that may not always be available. The degree of detail in temporal and spatial variability in ecosystem service provision is higher when using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool compared to the two ecosystem service models. In contrast, the ecosystem service models have lower requirements on input data and process knowledge. A relationship between service provision and beneficiaries is readily produced and can be visualized as a model output. The latter is especially useful for a practical decision-making context.

Download & links
Anna Lüke and Jochen Hack
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Anna Lüke and Jochen Hack
Anna Lüke and Jochen Hack
Viewed
Total article views: 839 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
622 206 11 839 16 25
  • HTML: 622
  • PDF: 206
  • XML: 11
  • Total: 839
  • BibTeX: 16
  • EndNote: 25
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Aug 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Aug 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 834 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 825 with geography defined and 9 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited
Saved
No saved metrics found.
Discussed
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 19 Jul 2018
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share