Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-629
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-629
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 16 Nov 2017

Submitted as: research article | 16 Nov 2017

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS). The revised manuscript was not accepted.

Hydrological response to climate extremes in mesoscale (pre-)Alpine basins at 0.5° and hyperresolution

Joost Buitink, Remko Uijlenhoet, and Adriaan J. Teuling Joost Buitink et al.
  • Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Abstract. The response of key hydrological variables to climate extremes within five meso-scale basins in the Swiss Alps is investigated at two different resolutions using the distributed hydrological model Spatial Processes in Hydrology (SPHY). Based on elevation and presence of glaciers, three catchments are identified as Alpine and two as pre-Alpine. We run SPHY both at hyperresolution and at 0.5 × 0.5 degree, and aggregate simulated runoff and evapotranspiration per season. For four seasonal extremes representing flood and drought/heatwave conditions we investigate the simulated response at both model resolutions. Results from the high resolution model show that the within-basin response gets more complex with more extreme events. The response within each basin can be grouped per land use type, due to different dominant runoff generating processes. A comparison with the coarse resolution model results shows that there is a large discrepancy between the two simulated responses. The low resolution model is not able to correctly simulate the complex hydrological response as simulated with the distributed model, since both the complex topography and land use classes are not properly represented. We show that hydrological response simulated with a high resolution model can be a lot more extreme than a low resolution model might indicate, which has important implications for global assessments carried out at course resolution.

Joost Buitink et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Joost Buitink et al.
Joost Buitink et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 969 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
543 414 12 969 25 35
  • HTML: 543
  • PDF: 414
  • XML: 12
  • Total: 969
  • BibTeX: 25
  • EndNote: 35
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Nov 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Nov 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 889 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 873 with geography defined and 16 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 24 Aug 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We compared the hydrological response simulated at two different spatial resolutions. The low resolution model was not able to simulate the complex response as was simulated with the high resolution model. The low resolution model underestimated the anomalies when compared with the high resolution model. This has implications on the interpretation of global scale impact studies (low resolution) on local or regional scales (high resolution).
We compared the hydrological response simulated at two different spatial resolutions. The low...
Citation