Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-187
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-187
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: comment/reply 15 May 2018

Submitted as: comment/reply | 15 May 2018

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion. Please read the editorial note.

Comment: Getting the Methodology Wrong for Analysing the Hydrological Changes in Watersheds

Nitin Bassi1, B. K. Harish Kumara2, Meera Sahasranaman3, and Arijit Ganguly3 Nitin Bassi et al.
  • 1Institute for Resource Analysis and Policy, Liaison Office, Delhi-110085, India
  • 2Center for Education Environment and Community, Hassan-573130, Karnataka, India
  • 3Institute for Resource Analysis and Policy, Head Office, Hyderabad-500082, India

Abstract. This article is a critique on the paper Spatial characterization of long-term hydrological change in the Arkavathy watershed adjacent to Bangalore, India, by Penny et al. (2018), published in the journal of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (volume 22, issue number 1). The article highlights choice of inappropriate methodology and faulty assumptions by the authors for analysing the watershed scale hydrological changes, generating misleading results and inferences.

Please read the editorial note first before accessing the discussion paper.
Nitin Bassi et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Nitin Bassi et al.
Nitin Bassi et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,909 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,459 429 21 1,909 18 20
  • HTML: 1,459
  • PDF: 429
  • XML: 21
  • Total: 1,909
  • BibTeX: 18
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 May 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 May 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 1,883 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,843 with geography defined and 40 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
Latest update: 24 Aug 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download

Please read the editorial note first before accessing the discussion paper

Citation