This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Trade-offs between crop-related (physical and virtual) water flows and the associated economic benefits and values: a case study of the Yellow River Basin
Pute Wu1,6,8,10,La Zhuo1,6,8,10,Guoping Zhang2,Mesfin M. Mekonnen3,Arjen Y. Hoekstra4,7,Yoshihide Wada5,Xuerui Gao1,6,8,10,Xining Zhao1,6,8,10,Yubao Wang6,9,and Shikun Sun6,9Pute Wu et al. Pute Wu1,6,8,10,La Zhuo1,6,8,10,Guoping Zhang2,Mesfin M. Mekonnen3,Arjen Y. Hoekstra4,7,Yoshihide Wada5,Xuerui Gao1,6,8,10,Xining Zhao1,6,8,10,Yubao Wang6,9,and Shikun Sun6,9
1Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
2Water Footprint Network, The Hague, 2594AV, The Netherlands
3Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA
4Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, 7500AE, The Netherlands
5International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, 2361, Austria
6Institute of Water Saving Agriculture in Arid Areas of China, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
7Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 259770, Singapore
8National Engineering Research Center for Water Saving Irrigation at Yangling, Yangling, 712100, China
9College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
10Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, 712100, China
1Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
2Water Footprint Network, The Hague, 2594AV, The Netherlands
3Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA
4Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, 7500AE, The Netherlands
5International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, 2361, Austria
6Institute of Water Saving Agriculture in Arid Areas of China, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
7Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 259770, Singapore
8National Engineering Research Center for Water Saving Irrigation at Yangling, Yangling, 712100, China
9College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China
10Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, 712100, China
Received: 10 Aug 2018 – Accepted for review: 16 Sep 2018 – Discussion started: 20 Sep 2018
Abstract. Water issues in many river basins associated with droughts, water over-exploitation and pollution are increasingly being driven by remote pressures through intensified virtual water (VW) flows. However, little attention has been paid to the internal trade-offs between the (physical and virtual) water flows and the associated economic benefits and incomes that the water generated. Here we estimate the concomitant reversed flows of economic benefits and values to the physical and VW flows in crop production and consumption at a basin level, by taking the Yellow River Basin (YRB) in both current three typical years (2003, 2004, and 2006, which were dry, average, and wet, respectively) and possible four scenarios for 2050 under climate-socio-economic changes as the study case. An algorithm for estimation of the economic net benefits of green and blue water use for crop production based on the water footprint (WF) accounting is developed. Results show that the net benefit of blue water (irrigation) was 13–42 % lower than that of green water used in irrigated croplands in the basin. Cropping pattern has defined the spatial heterogeneity in the levels of net benefits of water used for crops within the YRB. Provinces located in the relatively drier upper and middle reaches had high irrigation withdrawal rates while a low economic return to farmers because of growing relatively cheap crops. The YRB got increasingly net income due to exports of wheat, cotton and apples even though as a crop-related net VW importer associated to the intra-national trades. Considered scenarios for 2050 suggested that the economic returns of crop-related physical and VW flows were more sensitive than the quantity levels of corresponding water flows. This study implies the importance of managing the internal trade-offs or mutual effects between the water resources consumption and economic returns, in order to get a win-win situation in maximizing both the water use efficiency and economic productivities per drop of water flows.
Total article views: 487 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
387
94
6
487
12
10
HTML: 387
PDF: 94
XML: 6
Total: 487
BibTeX: 12
EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Sep 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 20 Sep 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 443 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 439 with geography defined
and 4 with unknown origin.
Country
#
Views
%
Total:
0
HTML:
0
PDF:
0
XML:
0
1
1
Cited
Saved
No saved metrics found.
Discussed
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 19 Feb 2019
Search articles
Download
Short summary
This study estimates the concomitant economic benefits and values to the crop-related (physical and virtual) water flows at a basin level. The net benefit of blue water was 13–42 % lower than that of green water in the case for the Yellow River Basin. The basin got a net income through the virtual water exports. It is necessary to manage the internal trade-offs between the water consumption and economic returns, for maximizing both the water use efficiency and water economic productivities.
This study estimates the concomitant economic benefits and values to the crop-related (physical...