Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-585
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-585
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 27 Feb 2019

Research article | 27 Feb 2019

Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. It is a manuscript under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Selection of multi-model ensemble of GCMs for the simulation of precipitation based on spatial assessment metrics

Kamal Ahmed1,2, Dhanapala Arachchige Sachindra3, Shamsuddin Shahid1, Mehmet Cüneyd Demirel4, and Eun-Sung Chung5 Kamal Ahmed et al.
  • 1Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru, 81310, Malaysia
  • 2Faculty of Water Resource Management, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, Balochistan, 90150, Pakistan
  • 3Institute for Sustainability and Innovation, College of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, P.O. Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria 8001, Australia
  • 4Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey
  • 5Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul, 139-743, Korea

Abstract. The climate modelling community has trialled a large number metrics to evaluate the temporal performance of the Global Circulation Models (GCMs) for the selection of GCMs, while very little attention has been given to spatial performance of GCMs which is equally important. This study evaluated the performance of 20 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) GCMs pertaining to their skills in simulating mean annual, monsoon and winter precipitation over Pakistan using state-of-the-art spatial metrics; SPAtial EFficiency, Goodman–Kruskal's lambda, Fractions Skill Score, Cramer’s V, Mapcurves, and Kling-Gupta efficiency for the period 1961–2005. The multi-model ensemble (MME) precipitation was generated through intelligent merging of simulated precipitation of selected GCMs employing Random Forest (RF) regression and Simple Mean (SM). The results indicated some differences in the ranks of GCMs for different metrics. The overall ranks indicated NorESM1-M, CESM1-CAM5, GFDL-CM3 and GFDL-ESM2G as the best GCMs in simulating the spatial patterns of mean annual, monsoon and winter precipitation over Pakistan. MME precipitation generated based on the best performing GCMs showed more similarities with observed precipitation compared to precipitation simulated by individual GCMs. The MME developed using RF displayed better performance than the MME-based on SM. Multiple spatial metrics have been used for the first time for selecting GCMs based on their capability to mimic the spatial patterns of annual and seasonal precipitation. The approach suggested in the present study can be extended to any number of GCMs and climate variables and applicable to any region for the suitable selection of an ensemble of GCMs to reduce uncertainties in climate projections.

Kamal Ahmed et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: final response (author comments only)
Status: final response (author comments only)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Login for Authors/Editors] [Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Kamal Ahmed et al.
Kamal Ahmed et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 462 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
360 98 4 462 8 8
  • HTML: 360
  • PDF: 98
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 462
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2019)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 338 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 336 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 19 Jul 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation