Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Discussion papers
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-699
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-699
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 14 Feb 2020

Submitted as: research article | 14 Feb 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

New Model of Reactive Transport in Single-Well Injection-Withdrawal Test with Aquitard Effect

Quanrong Wang1, Wenguang Shi1, and Hongbin Zhan2 Quanrong Wang et al.
  • 1School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei, 430074, P. R. China
  • 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-3115, USA

Abstract. The model of single-well injection-withdrawal (SWIW) test has been widely used to investigate reactive radial dispersion in remediation or parameter estimation of the in situ aquifers. Previous analytical solutions only focused on a completely isolated aquifer for the SWIW test, excluding any influence of aquitards bounding the tested aquifer. This simplification might be questionable in field applications when test durations are relatively long, because solute transport in or out of the bounding aquitards is inevitable due to molecular diffusion and cross-formational advective transport. Here, a new SWIW model is developed in an aquifer-aquitard system, and the analytical solution in the Laplace domain is derived. Four phases of the test are included: the injection phase, the chaser phase, the rest phase and the extraction phase. The Green's function method is employed for the solution in the extraction phase. As the permeability of aquitard is much smaller than the permeability of the aquifer, the flow is assumed to be perpendicular to the aquitard, thus only vertical dispersive and advective transports are considered for aquitard. The validity of this treatment is tested by a numerical solution. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the influence of vertical flow velocity and porosity in the aquitards, and radial dispersion of the aquifer is more sensitive to the SWIW test than other parameters. In the injection phase, the larger radial dispersivity of the aquifer could result in the smaller values of breakthrough curves (BTCs), while greater values of BTCs of the chaser and rest phases. In the extraction phase, it could lead to the smaller peak values of BTCs. The new model of this study performs better than previous studies excluding the aquitard effect for interpreting data of the field SWIW test.

Quanrong Wang et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: open (until 10 Apr 2020)
Status: open (until 10 Apr 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Quanrong Wang et al.

Quanrong Wang et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 109 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
85 22 2 109 8 0 1
  • HTML: 85
  • PDF: 22
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 109
  • Supplement: 8
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Feb 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 99 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 99 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 18 Feb 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation