Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-191
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-191
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: research article 14 May 2020

Submitted as: research article | 14 May 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

Learning from satellite observations: increased understanding of catchment processes through stepwise model improvement

Petra Hulsman, Hubert H. G. Savenije, and Markus Hrachowitz Petra Hulsman et al.
  • Water Resources Section, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, the Netherlands

Abstract. Satellite observations can provide valuable information for a better understanding of hydrological processes and thus serve as valuable tools for model structure development and improvement. While model calibration and evaluation has in recent years started to make increasing use of spatial, mostly remotely-sensed information, model structural development largely remains to rely on discharge observations at basin outlets only. Due to the ill-posed inverse nature and the related equifinality issues in the modelling process, this frequently results in poor representations of the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of system-internal processes, in particular for large river basins. The objective of this study is thus to explore the value of remotely-sensed, gridded data to improve our understanding of the processes underlying this heterogeneity and, as a consequence, their quantitative representation in models through a stepwise adaptation of model structures and parameters. For this purpose, a distributed, process-based hydrological model was developed for the study region, the poorly gauged Luangwa river basin. As a first step, this benchmark model was calibrated to discharge data only and, in a post-calibration evaluation procedure, tested for its ability to simultaneously reproduce (1) the basin-average temporal dynamics of remotely-sensed evaporation and total water storage anomalies, and (2) their temporally-averaged spatial pattern. This allowed the diagnosis of model structural deficiencies in reproducing these temporal dynamics and spatial patterns. Subsequently, the model structure was adapted in a step-wise procedure, testing five additional alternative process hypotheses that could potentially better describe the observed dynamics and pattern. These included, on the one hand, the addition and testing of alternative formulations of groundwater upwelling into wetlands as function of the water storage and, on the other hand, alternative spatial discretizations of the groundwater reservoir. Similar to the benchmark, each alternative model hypothesis was, in a next step, calibrated to discharge only and tested against its ability to reproduce the observed spatiotemporal pattern in evaporation and water storage anomalies. In a final step, all models were re-calibrated to discharge, evaporation and water storage anomalies simultaneously. The results indicated that (1) the benchmark model (Model A) could reasonably well reproduce the time series of observed discharge, basin-average evaporation and total water storage. In contrast, it poorly represented time series of evaporation in wetland dominated areas as well as the spatial pattern of evaporation and total water storage. (2) Step-wise adjusting the model structure (Models B–F) suggested that Model F, allowing for upwelling groundwater from a distributed representation of the groundwater reservoir and (3) simultaneously calibrating the model with respect to multiple variables, i.e. discharge, evaporation and total water storage anomalies, provided the best representation of all these variables with respect to their temporal dynamics and spatial pattern, except for the basin-average temporal dynamics in the total water storage anomalies. It was shown that satellite-based evaporation and total water storage anomaly data are not only valuable for multi-criteria calibration, but can play an important role in improving our understanding of hydrological processes through diagnosing model deficiencies and step-wise model structural improvement.

Petra Hulsman et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: open (until 09 Jul 2020)
Status: open (until 09 Jul 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Petra Hulsman et al.

Petra Hulsman et al.

Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 30 May 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Satellite observations have increasingly been used for model calibration, while model structural developments largely rely on discharge data often resulting in poor representations of internal rainfall-runoff processes, especially for large river basins. This study explores the combined use of spatial pattern and temporal dynamics of satellite-based evaporation and total water storage data for model structural improvement and model calibration for a large, semi-arid and data scarce river system.
Satellite observations have increasingly been used for model calibration, while model structural...
Citation