Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.936 IF 4.936
  • IF 5-year value: 5.615 IF 5-year
    5.615
  • CiteScore value: 4.94 CiteScore
    4.94
  • SNIP value: 1.612 SNIP 1.612
  • IPP value: 4.70 IPP 4.70
  • SJR value: 2.134 SJR 2.134
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 107 Scimago H
    index 107
  • h5-index value: 63 h5-index 63
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-206
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-206
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Submitted as: education and communication 18 May 2020

Submitted as: education and communication | 18 May 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

Teaching hydrogeology in the field: the bottleneck in student conceptual model development

Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez1,2 Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez
  • 1Department of Water Resources and Drinking Water, EAWAG, Dübendorf, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETHZ, Zürich, Switzerland

Abstract. Teaching hydrogeology in the field presents unique cognitive difficulties, including the multidisciplinary and hidden nature of the processes. Lecturers commonly encounter large heterogeneity in student backgrounds, and many students harbor pre-existing mental models of the subsurface that differ from reality. In this study, we assess the influence of a student’s prior knowledge on his/her outcome in an inquiry-based learning strategy designed for a hydrogeology field course. We also assess the effectiveness of this strategy in the students’ conceptual model expression for the field site. Statistical results showed that in general lower scores were obtained in the conceptual model expression than in the inquiry-based learning. However, students with a high prior knowledge showed in average a better performance in the conceptual model expression, although with a larger variability, indicating that the prior knowledge is not a guarantee for an adequate conceptual model conception. In general, a learning bottleneck was identified: going from the split information to the integration of it. In the light of these findings, and in order to improve the student’s ability for conceptual model expression, we recommend the inclusion of specific prior-to-field lessons in the classroom to introduce methodologies for the expression of hydrogeological conceptual models to identify and dispel any prior misconceptions.

Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez

Interactive discussion

Status: open (until 13 Jul 2020)
Status: open (until 13 Jul 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez

Joaquin Jimenez-Martinez

Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 30 May 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
In this study, we assess the influence of a student’s prior knowledge on his/her outcome in an inquiry-based learning strategy designed for a hydrogeology field course, and the effectiveness of this strategy in the students’ conceptual model expression for the field site. Lower scores were obtained in the conceptual model expression than in the inquiry-based learning. Although prior knowledge helps for a better performance, this is not a guarantee for an adequate conceptual model conception.
In this study, we assess the influence of a student’s prior knowledge on his/her outcome in an...
Citation